This research report categorizes the global Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market by players/brands, region, type and application. This report also studies the global market status, competition landscape, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels, distributors and Porter's Five Forces Analysis.
A mountain bike is a bicycle designed for off-road cycling. Mountain bikes share similarities with other bicycles, but incorporate features designed to enhance durability and performance in rough terrain. These typically include a front or full suspension, large knobby tires, more durable wheels, more powerful brakes, straight handlebars, and lower gear ratios for climbing steep grades. Mountain bikes are typically ridden on mountain trails, single track, fire roads, and other unpaved surfaces.
When riding mountain bike, it is necessary to have a good shoe to deliver power through the pedals. Some types of shoes are nylon-soled shoes, flat pedal shoe, clipless shoe. Choosing clipless spd-style shoes or flat-pedal, there are some important ‘must-haves’. A decent amount of stiffness to make sure energy goes into the shoe and the trail is key. It is also important to look for heel and toe protection to defend your feet from rocks and crashes.
In 2017, the global Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market size was xx million US$ and is forecast to xx million US in 2025, growing at a CAGR of xx% from 2018. The objectives of this study are to define, segment, and project the size of the Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market based on company, product type, application and key regions.
The various contributors involved in the value chain of Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks include manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, intermediaries, and customers. The key manufacturers in the Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks include
Five Ten Footwear Company
Trek Bicycle Corporation
Louis Garneau Sports
Market Size Split by Type
Mountain Bike Footwear
Mountain Bike Socks
Market Size Split by Application
Market size split by Region
Central & South America
Rest of Central & South America
Middle East & Africa
The study objectives of this report are:
To study and analyze the global Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market size (value & volume) by company, key regions/countries, products and application, history data from 2013 to 2017, and forecast to 2025.
To understand the structure of Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market by identifying its various subsegments.
To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks).
Focuses on the key global Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years.
To analyze the Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market.
To project the value and volume of Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries).
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks are as follows:
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million US$) and volume (K Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Mountain Bike Footwear and Socks market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.